tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3509053156280655479.post3288108990097104820..comments2023-06-14T08:24:18.553-04:00Comments on The Feminist Underground: Cover of the Yearhabladorahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01730183259272125337noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3509053156280655479.post-17188096223825692482008-09-23T19:16:00.000-04:002008-09-23T19:16:00.000-04:00Huh... Is it a critique or is it normalization?Ma...Huh... <BR/><BR/>Is it a critique or is it normalization?<BR/><BR/>Maybe it doesn't matter. It is funny.DJ Dual Corehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04381643830082969577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3509053156280655479.post-50962991116813843522008-09-23T16:47:00.000-04:002008-09-23T16:47:00.000-04:00Well, looking at the covers was fun - and I AM rel...Well, looking at the covers was fun - and I AM relieved it isn't all just airbrushed model waifs. The GQ cover made me laugh out loud - talk about cheesy. Really, though, it is hard to determine what the criteria were. I'd like to read the judges commentary, because most of these seem pretty dull (I'd even go so far to call the winning Spitzer cover dull).habladorahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01730183259272125337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3509053156280655479.post-42599235202644421402008-09-23T14:24:00.000-04:002008-09-23T14:24:00.000-04:00I'm more perplexed by the inclusion of Time magazi...I'm more perplexed by the inclusion of Time magazine's "And the Winner is*" cover of Obama. It's a really great photo of Obama, but still. Most of these covers weren't outstanding.NewsCathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05049304894327723728noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3509053156280655479.post-58520914666536754652008-09-23T11:53:00.000-04:002008-09-23T11:53:00.000-04:00i actually like this cover. its simplicity (and as...i actually like this cover. its simplicity (and as you mention, it's accuracy) is its greatest virtue. sometimes it takes great skill to have restraint.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com